Promoting entrepreneurship in the developing world
Par Oliver Balch, Guardian Professional,
Multinational companies are engaging in skills mentoring. But is helping subsistence farmers become better at what they do really promoting entrepreneurialism?
General Mills employs around 1,300 food scientists, nutritionists and
other technical specialists in the US. In the developing world, such
expertise is in short supply. In an attempt to bridge this knowledge
gap, the US food giant is connecting its in-house specialists with small
food processing firms in West Africa.
Instead of flying its staff out on a Peace Corps-style expedition, its volunteers hook up with local entrepreneurs
via Skype, phone and email for an hour or so per week. The model
ensures a longer-term engagement and fuller support services, from
quality enhancement to marketing.
"We now live in a world where a
PhD nutritionist sitting in Minneapolis can share that knowledge in
almost in real time with a company at the end of the road somewhere in
Zambia or Kenya", said Jeff Dykstra, executive director at Partners in Food Solutions, a business-backed non-profit that was set up to expand General Mills' programme.
The
social benefits of promoting entrepreneurship in developing markets are
indisputable. Partners in Food Solutions has so far supported 50 local
food processors in five African countries. The success of these
businesses has given rise to a secure market for around 100,000 small
producers. Couple that with the increased food security that comes from
getting higher quality products onto local shop shelves, and it looks
like good news.
The business benefits for the project's corporate
sponsors (which now include commodity trader Cargill, among others) are
less obvious. None of the corporate participants operate directly in the
markets concerned. Nor do any currently have equity stakes or supply
relationships with the enterprises that they are assisting.
According
to Dykstra, the initiative was always designed as a "tweak" on
traditional corporate philanthropy. The business outputs that have
emerged, which include reputational enhancement and improved employee
retention, are incidental "bi-products", he said.
Supporting start-ups: aid or trade?
Management theorists increasingly argue that corporate sustainability
programmes need to have a business rationale for the sponsor if they
are to become, well, sustainable. So can supporting entrepreneurs in the
developing world generate mutual benefits?
Chris Brett, head of corporate responsibility and sustainability at agricultural and food commodity firm Olam,
says yes. It all comes down to supply chain resilience. Olam has around
3.5 million smallholder farmers in its supply chain, he noted:
"Enabling farmers to move out of subsistence farming to becoming serious commercial partners is fundamental to our business model."
He cites Olam's work with rice farmers in Nigeria.
The Singapore-listed commodity trader is providing "entrepreneurial
smallholder rice farmers" with training, credit and technical inputs to
increase their yields and grow operations. The farmers (who commit to
selling to Olam) gain from have a stable buyer at a reasonable price,
while Nigeria can gradually reduce expensive rice imports (which
currently stand at around 1.5m metric tonnes per year). For Olam's part,
it lands itself a long-term supply of good quality crops.
The
model carries with it two question marks. Firstly, if the entrepreneur
is bound entirely within the corporate sponsor's value chain, the danger
of a local monopoly arises. "This structure provides Olam with a great
deal of control over prices of inputs, outputs, and, ultimately, over
farmers' profits", a recent report by the Rockefeller Foundation concludes.
Secondly
and more seriously, it's debatable whether helping subsistence farmers
become better at what they already do strictly counts as promoting
entrepreneurialism. Who exactly qualifies as an entrepreneur is highly
contested. At its most basic, the term supposes an individual who
exploits a new market opportunity to create social or economic value.
The emphasis is on the word new. A rice grower is still growing rice,
albeit more efficiently.
A clearer example perhaps is that of
Iri-iani, a co-operative of fairtrade tea producers in Kenya. With
funding from UK retailer M&S and several donor agencies, Iri-iani
has established its own processing and packaging facilities, enabling it
sell branded products rather than raw tea leafs that command a far
lower price.
M&S still sources Iri-iani's Pure Origin Mount
Kenya Teabags, benefitting from having a higher quality producer in its
supply chain, but the cooperative is generating revenues through sales
in its domestic market too. "We wanted to help our Kenyan tea farmers
understand how to add value to the tea they were growing… and grow their
business beyond just supplying to us", explained Louise Nicholls, head
of responsible sourcing at M&S.>>>
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire